According to a leaked source on a report soon due out, $8.8 BILLION (yes, BILLION) of our tax dollars have been misappropriated by contractors and government authorities (click for story). Retired Colonel David Hackworth reported on his website that an anonymous source cited a report due out soon that companies including VP Cheney’s Halliburton cannot explain where the money went. (Halliburton’s own part of the “loss” is almost one billion dollars.)

The provisional authority that the US setup in Iraq also was padding the books. In just one example, over eight thousands of guards were on the payroll, when in reality only six hundred people were working. Where did this money go?

If this was what happenned with the Iraqi oil funds, what do you think the loss of our $150 Billion tax dollars is?

Thankfully, Democratic Senators Wyden, Harkin, and Dorgan are asking a lot of questions and trying to get to the bottom of it. Thanks, fellas!

Yahoo! news article archived in related link.Thu Aug 19, 3:12 PM ET

By Sue Pleming

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – At least $8.8 billion in Iraqi funds that was given to Iraqi ministries by the former U.S.-led authority there cannot be accounted for, according to a draft U.S. audit set for release soon.

The audit by the Coalition Provisional Authority’s own Inspector General blasts the CPA for “not providing adequate stewardship” of at least $8.8 billion from the Development Fund for Iraq (news – web sites) that was given to Iraqi ministries.

The audit was first reported on a Web site earlier this month by journalist and retired Col. David Hackworth. A U.S. official confirmed the contents of the leaked audit cited by Hackworth (www.hackworth.com) were accurate.

The development fund is made up of proceeds from Iraqi oil sales, frozen assets from foreign governments and surplus from the U.N. Oil for Food Program. Its handling has already come under fire in a U.N.-mandated audit released last month.

Among the draft audit’s findings were that payrolls in Iraqi ministries under Coalition Provisional Authority control were padded with thousands of ghost employees.

In one example, the audit said the CPA paid for 74,000 guards even though the actual number could not be validated. In another, 8,206 guards were listed on a payroll but only 603 people doing the work could be counted.

Three Democratic senators — Ron Wyden of Oregon, Tom Harkin from Iowa and Byron Dorgan of North Dakota — demanded an explanation from Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld over the use of the funds by the CPA, which handed over authority to the Iraqis in June.

“The CPA apparently transferred this staggering sum of money with no written rules or guidelines for ensuring adequate managerial, financial or contractual controls over the funds,” said the letter sent by the senators on Thursday.

“Such enormous discrepancies raise very serious questions about potential fraud, waste and abuse,” said the senators.

A spokesman for the CPA Inspector General’s office confirmed “field work” had been completed on the audit but declined to give specifics. He said auditors were awaiting comment from the Pentagon (news – web sites) before releasing the final report, probably later this month.

The Pentagon did not immediately respond to questions.

An international audit report released last month that was requested by a U.N.-mandated monitoring body chided the CPA for oversight of spending of Iraq’s oil revenue.

While the International Advisory and Monitoring Board said the audit found no evidence of fraud in spending by the CPA after the U.S. invasion in March 2003, it said oversight was insufficient to ensure money was used for its intended purposes.

One of the main benefactors of the Iraq funds was Texas-based firm Halliburton, which was paid more than a billion dollars out of those funds to bring in fuel for Iraqi civilians.

The monitoring board said despite repeated requests it had not been given access to U.S. audits of contracts held by Halliburton, which was once run by Vice President Dick Cheney (news – web sites), and other firms that used the development funds.

By walterh

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *