There’s mostly good press for California Senator Barbara Boxer, and her firey stance since Congress reconvened January 6th. From standing up to recognize and promote that there was indeed election fraud in the 2004 General Election to using Condoleeza Rice’s OWN WORDS in what Rice considered “impugning her integrity”, Boxer seems to stand alone. She’s starting to give the Democratic Party it’s spine back.
Boxer is living up to her name. She’s a fighter, and I’m glad she’s standing up for what she believes in. Hopefully it’ll rub off on to her Senate bretheren.
Article archived here
Democratic Boxer comes out swinginâ€™
Published Sunday, January 30, 2005
WASHINGTON (AP) – Sen. Barbara Boxer has always spoken up, but the California Democrat seems to have gotten a lot louder lately.
Her opposition to Condoleezza Riceâ€™s secretary of state nomination was so combative that it was parodied on Saturday Night Live. That came on the heels of her decision to sign onto a House memberâ€™s complaint about Ohio voting problems, forcing Congress to debate them before certifying President George W. Bushâ€™s re-election victory.
Sheâ€™s being touted on liberal blogs as the Democratsâ€™ best hope for president in 2008. Conservatives are excoriating her as – in House Minority Leader Tom DeLayâ€™s phrase – the leader of the ” â€˜X-Filesâ€™ wing” of the Democratic Party.
But Boxer says she is just standing up for what she believes.
“Iâ€™ve always been this way,” she says, “and Iâ€™m trying to figure out exactly why people suddenly find this to be interesting, you know. Somehow I have touched something inside people, and I have not ever had this happen before. The only thing I can think, after reading what people said, is a feeling that Iâ€™m asking the kind of questions and saying the kind of things that they are feeling.”
Maybe sheâ€™s becoming a spokeswoman, or even a symbol, for voters who oppose the Iraq war or feel shut out by the Bush administration. Maybe, with the Democratic Party at sea after Novemberâ€™s election losses, some people sense a leadership void and are looking to her to fill it.
Maybe itâ€™s not that Boxerâ€™s gotten louder but that other Democrats can barely be heard at all. At least, thatâ€™s what some of her supporters are saying.
Whatever the explanation, Boxer, 64, has never been more in the spotlight. At a time when Republican dominance of Washington politics is nearly complete, a Marin County liberal who drives a hybrid car and opposes almost everything the GOP does has become a newly prominent face of the Democratic Party.
“She seems to be assuming the position of being an outspoken voice for, as someone else said, â€˜the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party,â€™” says Los Angeles Democratic strategist Darry Sragow, echoing a phrase adopted by former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean.
“In the wake of the losses in November … there is a vacuum, thereâ€™s hand-wringing, thereâ€™s self-reflection, and she seems to have pretty sure footing as a determined, committed spokesperson for the liberals in the party,” Sragow says. “Part of the hand-wringing will be over whether thatâ€™s a good thing or a bad thing.”
Barely five feet tall, Boxer must stand on a box – which she sometimes refers to as “the Boxer Box” – to see over the podium at news conferences. Fond of gold jewelry and colorful, occasionally mismatched outfits, sheâ€™s energetic and aggressive, given to dressing down government officials at hearings, especially when reporters are within earshot.
That rankles Republicans, who say sheâ€™s more show horse than work horse in the Senate. But sometimes, she can make even fellow Democrats squirm.
In the ongoing Democratic debate about how to effectively oppose the Republicans, Boxer represents a solution not everyone can embrace: She simply opposes, often without bothering to compromise. To some, sheâ€™s too extreme and risks alienating moderate voters without producing legislative results.
Sen. Mark Dayton of Minnesota, a fellow liberal who stood with Boxer in opposing Rice, criticized her on the Senate floor over her decision to bring the November election certification to a halt. He called it “seriously misguided.”
But the combative qualities that turn some people off endear her to others. “Democrats are so afraid of being criticized, or so afraid that theyâ€™ll be accused of being too liberal, that they donâ€™t really act with the courage of their convictions. And then comes Barbara Boxer,” says Madeleine Begun Kane, a writer from Queens, N.Y., who created a “President Boxer” blog. “Sheâ€™s been a shining light during an otherwise very depressing period.”
For the record, Boxer says she has no interest in running for president. But sheâ€™s gratified by the blogs and the Boxer for President bumper stickers selling for $3.95.
If she did ever want to try for president, she could point to some compelling evidence of electability.
In winning her third Senate term in November, Boxer was the nationâ€™s third-highest vote-getter, behind only Bush and Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry. She squashed Republican opponent Bill Jones by 20 percentage points, scoring a bigger share of the electorate than Dianne Feinstein, the stateâ€™s other Democratic senator, got in her last election.
Since she left the House to run for Senate, Republicans have targeted Boxer as too liberal for California. She had tough races in 1992, when she beat a conservative television commentator by 5 percentage points, and in 1998, when she defeated a former state treasurer by 10.
Republicans talked tough about taking her on in 2004 as well, but in the end they hardly even tried. Jones, a social conservative and former California secretary of state, was endorsed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger; but he ran a weak campaign and never raised enough money to air a single television commercial.
Since Boxer and Feinstein joined the Senate in 1992â€™s Year of the Woman, Feinstein has been the more prominent. Although they have cooperated on initiatives and vote together more often than not, they do not have a close relationship and part ways on some issues, including the Iraq war and the Rice nomination.
Republicans say they can work with Feinstein. Her advice and endorsement are courted by Schwarzenegger and others on issues while Boxer, whom they generally despise, is left on the sidelines.
But lately itâ€™s been Boxer in the headlines, sought out by reporters from The New York Times and Rolling Stone and parodied on SNL.
In the skit that aired Jan. 22, Boxer, as portrayed by actress Amy Poehler, used a series of props to interrogate Rice – among them a packet of baloney, a poster of the number zero representing weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq and a bar graph with one barely visible bar “the truth” and another bar stretching the length of the chart “what you say.”
Boxer, who did arm herself with several enlarged maps and quotations during Riceâ€™s confirmation hearing, loved the skit. “They really nailed me,” she says. “It was the funniest thing Iâ€™ve ever seen.”
Some Republicans have suggested that Boxer should have accepted Bushâ€™s re-election victory as a sign of acceptance for his secretary of state nominee and kept her mouth shut on the Rice nomination.
Sheâ€™s in no danger of doing that – on any issue.
“Bush got 60 million votes plus, and Kerry got 57 million votes plus, so you canâ€™t say it isnâ€™t a sizable portion of the country that doesnâ€™t deserve to be heard,” Boxer said.
“They do deserve to be heard; and even if they are far left, they deserve to be heard.”
Copyright 2005 Associated Press.