Comments for ProudLiberal.org http://www.proudliberal.org Responding to the Right Wing Echochamber Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:57:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 Comment on Make a donation, receive a threat by MK in California http://www.proudliberal.org/2008/09/30/make-a-donation-receive-a-threat/#comment-32865 MK in California Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:33:46 +0000 http://www.proudliberal.org/?p=662#comment-32865 I received one of the Rich letters after donating to Barack Obama in the primary and general elections and Hillary Clinton in the primary. No 527's. No other liberal organizations. I received one of the Rich letters after donating to Barack Obama in the primary and general elections and Hillary Clinton in the primary. No 527’s. No other liberal organizations.

]]> Comment on Thank you, George Bush! by Jennica http://www.proudliberal.org/2008/05/28/thank-you-george-bush/#comment-32825 Jennica Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:57:18 +0000 http://www.proudliberal.org/2008/05/28/thank-you-george-bush/#comment-32825 “People who make under $80,000 are too stupid to understand taxes anyway.” -John McCain “People who make under $80,000 are too stupid to understand taxes anyway.”
-John McCain

]]> Comment on Why the T in GLBT is just as important as the other letters by Heath http://www.proudliberal.org/2007/10/23/why-the-t-in-glbt-is-just-as-important-as-the-other-letters/#comment-30972 Heath Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:08:32 +0000 http://www.proudliberal.org/2007/10/23/why-the-t-in-glbt-is-just-as-important-as-the-other-letters/#comment-30972 I agree Rachel should have protection- anyone who is oppressed should. However, not under the GL, and B, I guess, umbrella- unless she was also a lesbian or bisexual who happens to be TG. I support TG rights, but their agenda is NOT part of the Gay and Lesbian agenda. Most TG's are heterosexual. If the world won't accpt you because you still look like a man in drag, that is still no reason to jump on the gay bandwagon. I agree Rachel should have protection- anyone who is oppressed should. However, not under the GL, and B, I guess, umbrella- unless she was also a lesbian or bisexual who happens to be TG. I support TG rights, but their agenda is NOT part of the Gay and Lesbian agenda. Most TG’s are heterosexual. If the world won’t accpt you because you still look like a man in drag, that is still no reason to jump on the gay bandwagon.

]]> Comment on Has nobody made the connection? by Richard http://www.proudliberal.org/2007/10/23/has-nobody-made-the-connection/#comment-30617 Richard Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:38:09 +0000 http://www.proudliberal.org/2007/10/23/has-nobody-made-the-connection/#comment-30617 dang..I thought the "connection" was going to be Obama and Saddam having the same name.."Hussein". dang..I thought the “connection” was going to be Obama and Saddam having the same name..”Hussein”.

]]> Comment on ProudLiberal is back! by Freestate TV http://www.proudliberal.org/2004/08/17/proudliberal-is-back/#comment-27841 Freestate TV Tue, 03 Jul 2007 07:10:50 +0000 http://www.proudliberal.org/archives/2004/08/17/proudliberal-is-back/#comment-27841 What an excellent blog! What a great read, I had to read it twice it was so good! Check out my blog below for similar content. <a href="http://www.freestate.tv" rel="nofollow">www.freestate.tv</a> What an excellent blog! What a great read, I had to read it twice it was so good!

Check out my blog below for similar content.

http://www.freestate.tv

]]> Comment on Maryland at the forefront by Nick Todd http://www.proudliberal.org/2007/04/10/maryland-at-the-forefront/#comment-23233 Nick Todd Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:45:59 +0000 http://www.proudliberal.org/archives/2007/04/10/maryland-at-the-forefront/#comment-23233 Yes -- we can have this in place in 2012 with focus. We have some 70% of Americans on our side as well -- let's keep it moving in state legislatures! See www.nationalpopularvote.com for what's happening in your state. Yes — we can have this in place in 2012 with focus. We have some 70% of Americans on our side as well — let’s keep it moving in state legislatures! See http://www.nationalpopularvote.com for what’s happening in your state.

]]> Comment on One soldier I will NOT support by Vince http://www.proudliberal.org/2007/03/28/one-soldier-i-will-not-support/#comment-23067 Vince Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:02:52 +0000 http://www.proudliberal.org/archives/2007/03/28/one-soldier-i-will-not-support/#comment-23067 No doubt Sergeant Ramode was severely out of line. However, I’m puzzled as to why Corey Andrew Powell’s reference to “pedophilic predators” “begging” teenagers to join the military gets a complete pass. I see the implications about the sergeant as being what provoked the over-the-top exchange — not the all capitals second email sent by Ramode. I’ve seen at least one post that suggests Sergeant Ramode is psychotic. Do recruiters have access to loaded weapons? If they do, I’m not sure Powell was being the sharpest tool in the shed if he set out to embarrass the recruiter by revealing their email exchange. No doubt Sergeant Ramode was severely out of line. However, I’m puzzled as to why Corey Andrew Powell’s reference to “pedophilic predators” “begging” teenagers to join the military gets a complete pass. I see the implications about the sergeant as being what provoked the over-the-top exchange — not the all capitals second email sent by Ramode.

I’ve seen at least one post that suggests Sergeant Ramode is psychotic. Do recruiters have access to loaded weapons? If they do, I’m not sure Powell was being the sharpest tool in the shed if he set out to embarrass the recruiter by revealing their email exchange.

]]> Comment on Treason by dubh http://www.proudliberal.org/2006/10/12/treason/#comment-15680 dubh Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:06:18 +0000 http://www.proudliberal.org/archives/2006/10/12/treason/#comment-15680 We can only hope that this is just a warm-up to bush, cheyney, rummy et al being charged with treason, too. A test run of the machinery, to make sure the auld beast is firing on all cylinders... Yup, Gadahn has the right to be Islamic-- and the right to be an 'Islam<i>ist</i>' too if he so chooses-- just like I have the right to call myself a Liberal Christian. A fascinating part of the U.S. Code that Walter quotes--"Whoever, <em>owing allegiance</em>..." etc is the wording-- a big question becomes to whom does a given person give their primary allegiance? Obviously in Gadahn's case his primary alleigance is to his (I'd say perverted)interpretation of his faith. As far as I can tell, he hasn't ever renounced his U.S. citizenship, so our government has context under which to charge him with treason. He's appeared in videos with Zawahiri, the radical Islamist version of appearing on American Idol-- now that he's been charged with treason, it's like he's moved on to the semi-finals, and we've handed him bigger cred amongst his terrorist colleagues. Bush Corporation Meaningless Gesture Number 12,847... We can only hope that this is just a warm-up to bush, cheyney, rummy et al being charged with treason, too. A test run of the machinery, to make sure the auld beast is firing on all cylinders… Yup, Gadahn has the right to be Islamic– and the right to be an ‘Islamist‘ too if he so chooses– just like I have the right to call myself a Liberal Christian. A fascinating part of the U.S. Code that Walter quotes–”Whoever, owing allegiance…” etc is the wording– a big question becomes to whom does a given person give their primary allegiance? Obviously in Gadahn’s case his primary alleigance is to his (I’d say perverted)interpretation of his faith. As far as I can tell, he hasn’t ever renounced his U.S. citizenship, so our government has context under which to charge him with treason. He’s appeared in videos with Zawahiri, the radical Islamist version of appearing on American Idol– now that he’s been charged with treason, it’s like he’s moved on to the semi-finals, and we’ve handed him bigger cred amongst his terrorist colleagues. Bush Corporation Meaningless Gesture Number 12,847…

]]> Comment on Olbermann on the Liar in Chief by Black http://www.proudliberal.org/2006/10/06/olbermann-on-the-liar-in-chief/#comment-15644 Black Sat, 07 Oct 2006 07:16:45 +0000 http://www.proudliberal.org/archives/2006/10/06/olbermann-on-the-liar-in-chief/#comment-15644 Well done Mr. Olberman and peripheral props to the broadcaster for <i>actually airing</i> a deep, detailed, and passionate piece that is in league with the very best of broadcast journalism and opinion. We cannot allow the the GOP to further erode and pervert the Constitution or our mandate to be a shining beacon of hope and liberty to the world. This President is perhaps the only person on <b>Earth</b> who wouldn't ask his father-- who prosecuted a war in Iraq himself as President sometime in the past, remember(the GOP and MSM sure hope you don't)--won't even ASK his father for advice, observations, input of any kind. Seemingly won't even consider it. To further illuminate the psychological dysfunction of this, consider that Bill Clinton himself--apparently a Lying Arch Devil Fornicator in the view of some-- states unequivocally that if he were in W's shoes, he'd immediately seek HW's input. Hell, if <i>Hugo Chavez</i> were in W's situation, he'd ask for HW's input, too. The dam is gonna burst. Well done Mr. Olberman and peripheral props to the broadcaster for actually airing a deep, detailed, and passionate piece that is in league with the very best of broadcast journalism and opinion. We cannot allow the the GOP to further erode and pervert the Constitution or our mandate to be a shining beacon of hope and liberty to the world. This President is perhaps the only person on Earth who wouldn’t ask his father– who prosecuted a war in Iraq himself as President sometime in the past, remember(the GOP and MSM sure hope you don’t)–won’t even ASK his father for advice, observations, input of any kind. Seemingly won’t even consider it. To further illuminate the psychological dysfunction of this, consider that Bill Clinton himself–apparently a Lying Arch Devil Fornicator in the view of some– states unequivocally that if he were in W’s shoes, he’d immediately seek HW’s input. Hell, if Hugo Chavez were in W’s situation, he’d ask for HW’s input, too. The dam is gonna burst.

]]> Comment on Is Bush a racist? by Anonymous http://www.proudliberal.org/2004/03/25/is-bush-a-racist/#comment-3287 Anonymous Mon, 15 May 2006 13:28:20 +0000 http://www.proudliberal.org/archives/2004/03/25/is-bush-a-racist/#comment-3287 It appears that the author is seeing what s/he wants to see. I see two comrades getting along well with one another. What would the assumption be if Mr. Jackson were white and bald? So Mr. Bush shouldn't kid around with him in fear of being labeled a racist? Very sad... It appears that the author is seeing what s/he wants to see. I see two comrades getting along well with one another. What would the assumption be if Mr. Jackson were white and bald? So Mr. Bush shouldn’t kid around with him in fear of being labeled a racist? Very sad…

]]>